The Goods and Services Tax (GST), implemented in India in July 2017, has been one of the most significant tax reforms in the country’s history. While the government, led by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, has strongly championed GST as a landmark achievement, it has faced severe criticism from various opposition parties. These political groups have raised concerns regarding the implementation, complexities, and the long-term effects of GST on businesses and the common man.
In this blog, we explore the opposition’s perspective on GST, examining their concerns and criticisms.
1. GST as a ‘One-Size-Fits-All’ Solution
One of the primary criticisms from opposition parties has been that the GST system is essentially a “one-size-fits-all” solution that does not account for the diversity in India’s economic landscape. They argue that GST’s uniformity does not consider the different needs of states, sectors, and businesses, especially the small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs).
Key Concerns:
- Complex Compliance Requirements: The opposition argues that the GST compliance process is burdensome for small traders, entrepreneurs, and businesses. Many of them find the multi-stage tax system and the GST filing process cumbersome and difficult to navigate.
- Increased Operational Costs for Small Businesses: Small businesses, which form the backbone of India’s economy, have found the GST framework to be an extra financial and administrative burden. The opposition claims that GST has led to increased costs for SMEs, with many struggling to comply with new rules.
2. Impact on the Unorganized Sector
The opposition has consistently raised concerns about how GST has negatively impacted India’s unorganized sector—a sector that contributes significantly to the Indian economy but operates on informal terms.
Key Concerns:
- Taxation on the Informal Sector: Many small traders, artisans, and unregistered businesses found themselves struggling under the weight of GST. The mandatory registration under GST for businesses with a turnover above ₹40 lakh has left many in the unorganized sector either unwilling or unable to comply with the law.
- Disruption in Traditional Practices: Several opposition leaders have argued that the imposition of GST on small, informal businesses has caused disruptions to the livelihood of millions, especially in rural and semi-urban areas where such businesses are vital.
3. High Tax Slabs and Inflationary Pressures
The high tax slabs introduced under the GST regime have been another point of contention for opposition parties. Although the government has made efforts to reduce GST rates on essential goods and services, several opposition leaders argue that many everyday items still remain under the higher tax slabs, leading to inflation and a rise in the cost of living.
Key Concerns:
- Impact on the Common Man: The opposition claims that essential goods like food grains, fuel, and medicine are still subject to GST, which adversely impacts the common man. With the cost of basic goods rising, the opposition argues that GST has increased the financial burden on the average citizen.
- Price Rise Across Sectors: The opposition parties have also pointed out that the higher tax slabs on luxury items or non-essential goods have led to inflationary pressures across sectors. This has particularly hurt the middle and lower-income groups.
4. Centralization of Power and State Concerns
A major area of concern for opposition parties is the centralization of power that the GST regime has created. The GST Council, which is responsible for setting the tax rates and policies, is primarily controlled by the Central Government, with limited input from states. Opposition leaders have expressed concerns that this undermines the federal structure of India and strips states of their ability to make decisions that directly impact their economies.
Key Concerns:
- Loss of Financial Autonomy for States: Many opposition parties, particularly those representing states with unique economic conditions, have argued that GST has led to a reduction in states’ revenue. States no longer have the flexibility to impose their own taxes, which, they claim, puts them at a financial disadvantage.
- Unequal Revenue Distribution: Some states, especially those with less developed economies, feel that GST has caused them to lose out on revenue as the system doesn’t compensate them for the loss in tax revenues. They argue that the Central Government has not done enough to balance out this loss, leaving them financially constrained.
5. Implementation and Technology Glitches
Opposition parties have also highlighted the poor implementation of the GST framework and the technological glitches that have hindered its smooth rollout. They argue that the rush to implement GST in a short time frame without adequate preparation led to significant operational challenges.
Key Concerns:
- Technical Issues in the GST Portal: The GST portal, where businesses and individuals are required to file returns and maintain records, was not fully prepared to handle the volume of transactions. This led to delays, confusion, and frustration among taxpayers and businesses, particularly in the early stages.
- Lack of Support for Businesses: Many businesses, especially small ones, found it difficult to adapt to the new tax system due to a lack of training and proper support. The opposition argues that the government failed to provide adequate assistance during the transition phase.
6. The Role of the GST Compensation Cess
The GST Compensation Cess was introduced to compensate states for any potential revenue loss in the first five years following the implementation of GST. However, opposition parties have been critical of the cess system, claiming that it has not been adequately disbursed to states.
Key Concerns:
- Delay in Compensation Payments: Opposition leaders from several states have raised concerns about the delay in receiving compensation from the central government. They argue that the GST compensation has not been released on time, leaving states facing a revenue shortfall.
- Political Motivations: Critics from opposition parties claim that the central government has used the GST Compensation Cess as a political tool, selectively releasing funds based on political considerations rather than the actual financial needs of states.
7. Opposition’s Alternative View on Tax Reforms
While opposing the current GST framework, many political parties have suggested alternatives. These include revamping the current tax structure to make it more state-centric or advocating for a simplified tax system with fewer tax slabs to reduce complexity.
Some opposition parties have also suggested that the government focus more on direct benefits transfers or subsidies for the common man rather than relying on GST to generate revenue.
Conclusion: A Divisive Issue
The implementation of GST has been a highly divisive issue in Indian politics. While the ruling government continues to defend it as a revolutionary reform, opposition parties remain critical of its impact on small businesses, the informal sector, and the common man. The concerns raised by the opposition highlight the complexities and challenges of implementing a unified tax system in a diverse country like India.
Moving forward, it’s clear that GST will continue to evolve, and the debate over its merits and shortcomings is far from over. It will require collaboration, revisions, and adaptations to address the concerns of all stakeholders, including the opposition.
📞 Need Assistance with GST Compliance?
If you’re facing challenges with GST filing, registration, or any tax-related concerns, feel free to contact us for expert guidance and solutions.
📍 Taxeasy Solution
Supaul Bazar, Biraul,
Darbhanga, Bihar – 847203
📞 Mob: 6289187606
📧 Email: jhajp96@gmail.com
